[Tlhingan-hol] Conversational klingon and the use of {nuq}
Lieven
levinius at gmx.de
Sun May 29 04:56:14 PDT 2016
Am 29.05.2016 um 13:19 schrieb mayqel qunenoS:
> <What is your number, Terran?> {nuq mI'lIj, tera'ngan.}
> <What is this place?> {Daqvam nuq.}
> <What is this?> {Dochvam nuq.}
These phrases are indeed controversary and have caused some discussions
before.
> Are CK's examples clipped klingon or something ?
Clipped Klingon is always a good explanation, that's why Okrand
initially "invented" it . :-)
I'm not sure where I got that from, but I seem to remember that in this
case, {nuq} works here just like pronouns do: {SoH} can be "you" but
also "you are". So nuq mean "what (is)".
{Daqvam nuq.} = "what (is) this place?"
{Dochvam nuq.} = "what (is) this thing"
Just like in {tera'ngan ghaH} = "He (is) a terran"
Well, now following that logic, then it should be {mI'lIj nuq}, but then
maybe there is a rule it can be reversed?
Just some thoughts about that. I'm not sure about the basics of all what
I just wrote. DapollaH pagh DapolHa'laH.
--
Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
Grammarian of the KLI
http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher
http://www.klingonwiki.net
More information about the Tlhingan-hol
mailing list