[Tlhingan-hol] KLBC : {'e'} and {neH}

[SuStel]

On 2/1/2016 4:10 AM, mayql qunenoS wrote:
> Qov :
>
>> I accept {... 'e' qa'agh} as use of the prefix trick,
>> with 'e' now being an indirect object, but I don't
>> recall if it's been done in canon.
>
> SuStel :
>
>> {'e'} remains a direct object; {qa-} now agrees with
>> an otherwise unstated indirect object ({SoH}).
>
> This will sound strange, but I didn't think any of these while I was
> writing.. I just wrote the sentence, the way I *felt* it to be right..

I suspect that's how we got the prefix trick in the first place...

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name