[Tlhingan-hol] KLBC : {'e'} and {neH}

[mayql qunenoS]

Qov :

> I accept {... 'e' qa'agh} as use of the prefix trick,
> with 'e' now being an indirect object, but I don't
> recall if it's been done in canon.

SuStel :

> {'e'} remains a direct object; {qa-} now agrees with
> an otherwise unstated indirect object ({SoH}).

This will sound strange, but I didn't think any of these while I was
writing.. I just wrote the sentence, the way I *felt* it to be right..

qunnoq

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:20 AM, SuStel <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:
> On 1/31/2016 4:22 PM, qov at kli.org wrote:
>>
>> I will point at something here that you snuck in as you changed the
>> sentence:
>>
>>> {verenganvaD ngev'egh SoSlI' 'e' qa'agh vIneH}
>>> <I want to show you, that your mother sells herself to the ferengi>
>>
>>
>> When you're using sentence as object with {'e'}, the object of the second
>> sentence is the first sentence, and that's a 3rd person singular object.
>> Normally that would require a pronoun from the appropriate column. I
>> accept
>> {... 'e' qa'agh} as use of the prefix trick, with 'e' now being an
>> indirect
>> object, but I don't recall if it's been done in canon.
>
>
> {'e'} remains a direct object; {qa-} now agrees with an otherwise unstated
> indirect object ({SoH}).
>
> qaSlaw'pu'be' 'ach vIlajbej.
>
> --
> SuStel
> http://trimboli.name
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tlhingan-hol mailing list
> Tlhingan-hol at kli.org
> http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol