[Tlhingan-hol] Concerning the purpose clauses

SuStel sustel at trimboli.name
Tue Nov 10 12:07:28 PST 2015


On 11/10/2015 2:39 PM, qunnoQ HoD wrote:
>> There is no “but”. Okrand says the {-meH} clause must precede the
> noun or verb it modifies. Nothing anywhere suggests otherwise.
>
> however this example confuses me : {jIpaSqu'mo' narghpu' qaSuchmeH
> 'eb} <<Because I'm very late, the opportunity to visit you has
> escaped.>>
>
> why is the {qaSuchmeH 'eb} at the end,instead of the beginning of the
> sentence ?

The {-meH} clause must come before the word it modifies (not necessarily
the sentence). {qaSuchmeH} "in order that I visit you" is modifying
{'eb} "opportunity," not any other part of the sentence.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name




More information about the Tlhingan-hol mailing list