[Tlhingan-hol] KLCP 1 vocab practice...

[chransberry at gmail.com]

Today's words are 'uS, SaQ, naj, ghogh, ghor, and yaj.

—-—-—

'uSwIj QID targh 'e' vInaj.
I dreamed that a targ wounded my leg.

'oy'mo' jISaQ.
Because of the pain, I cried.

targh nach vIghor 'e' vInID.
I tried to break the targ's head.

pay' ghogh Doj vIQoy!
Suddenly I heard an impressive voice!

'ach 'oH vIyajbe'.
But I didn't understand it.

—-—

-QISta'

Connected by DROID on Verizon Wireless

-----Original message-----
From: Robyn Stewart <robyn at flyingstart.ca>
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhIngan-Hol at kli.org>
Sent: Sun, Mar 27, 2016 14:22:00 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] KLCP 1 vocab practice...

I see what you're doing there.  I have to admit I do it accidentally when
speaking a non-native language other than Klingon, so I acknowledge that it
may not be entirely deliberate. But it's interfering with communication. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mayql qunenoS [mailto:mihkoun at gmail.com]
> Sent: March 27, 2016 1:39
> To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] KLCP 1 vocab practice...
> 
> Qov:
> > Okrand always seems to put -taH on a
> > pronoun when it's been used as to be with -Daq.
> 
> because this is very interesting, we discuss this I want it. 10 minutes
ago,
> when I checked the asking sentences, {'oH} {-taH} and they don't connect
> them, I noticed that. However, {'oH} {-taH} and they obviously connect
them,
> the answering sentences.
> 
> a person location we inquire if we want it, then {-taH} we need to use it,
I
> understand that. why ? away from that location because he is able to go
that
> person. there, now is being that person, however later there, isn't there
that
> person.
> 
> but for a place if we need to ask, or for a which is unable to move object
we
> ask we want it, then why {-taH} we need to use it ?
> 
> mayqel mIv Hurgh qunnoq
> now if we don't attack them, then for them slaves we become
> 
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 7:45 AM,  <qov at kli.org> wrote:
> > Dojqu' SajlIj!
> > Your pet is very impressive!
> > - maj
> >
> >
> > navmeyvetlh DawoDchugh bIpay.
> > If you throw those papers away you will regret.
> > (a bit insecure on this one... I want to say you will regret it, but
> > it doesn't seem like a {-chugh} clause can be referred to with {'e'}.)
> >
> > - A good trick for when English does that ambiguous "it" thing is to
throw in
> another noun: navmeyvetlh DawoDchugh wIv Dapay. But I know no reason
> why your original sentence can't stand.
> >
> > vIwoDlaHbe'! SajwIj nujDaq bIH!
> > I can't throw them away! They're in my pet's mouth!
> >
> > - Okrand always seems to put -taH on a pronoun when it's been used as to
> be with -Daq.
> >
> > Doj nIm wIb chab.
> > The cheesecake is impressive.
> >
> > - reH Doj nIm wIb chab. 'a not wIb.
> >
> > - Qov
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tlhingan-hol mailing list
> > Tlhingan-hol at kli.org
> > http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tlhingan-hol mailing list
> Tlhingan-hol at kli.org
> http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol


_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol at kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/attachments/20160329/533290c9/attachment.html>