[Tlhingan-hol] 19 new words to create

[mayql qunenoS]

lojmIt tI'wI' nuv and ghunchu'wI' thank you for taking the time to reply.

I read your comments carefully, and I understand now all these things,
which troubled me yesterday.

I liked very much this sentence :

Nouns with Type 5 suffixes go at the head of the sentence.

..because it clarifies a lot of things.

as for the sentence with the purpose clause, (quqlaH cha' Hol ghojmeH
mIwmey net Sov) I guess I was confused because the subject of {quqlaH}
was "far from it". I know this probably sounds strange, but I had this
-obviously wrong- impression, that the subject is always next to the
verb. So I didn't think of considering the {mIwmey} as the subject of
{quqlaH}.

luckily, now I understand.

and I also read again the TKD on rovers, so that question is answered too.

thank you.

qunnoq

On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Alan Anderson <qunchuy at alcaco.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 1:12 PM, mayql qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
>> the {-qu'} emphasizes only the preceding {-be'}, or the entire
>> construction that precedes it ?
>
> See TKD page 48:
>
>>   pIHoHvIpbe'qu'    we are NOT afraid to kill you
>>   pIHoHvIpqu'be'    we are not AFRAID to kill you
>>   pIHoHqu'vIpbe'    we are not afraid to KILL you.
>
> {-qu} emphasizes what it follows. Its effect seems most often limited
> to the noun or suffix immediately before it. I'm sure there are times
> when it makes sense to interpret its range more widely, but this was
> not one of them.
>
> -- ghunchu'wI'
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tlhingan-hol mailing list
> Tlhingan-hol at kli.org
> http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol