[Tlhingan-hol] Type 5 on first noun
SuStel
sustel at trimboli.name
Fri Feb 5 14:01:59 PST 2016
On 2/5/2016 4:52 PM, lojmIttI'wI'nuv wrote:
> It’s already been pointed out that this is not a complete sentence, and
> so likely not a noun-noun construction. Likely, he wanted to be able to
> express the difference between “The feast at Qam-Chee” and “At the feast
> of Qam-Chee”.
He could have said simply, {QamchIy 'uQ'a'} "the feast of Qam-Chee."
Later on he uses a title {SIqral bIQtIq ghom} "Assembly at the River
Skral." Why didn't he say {SIqral bIQtIqDaq ghom}? That even works with
{ghom} as a verb.
And then later is {SIqral bIQtIq may'} "The Battle at the River Skral,"
and not *{SIqral bIQtIqDaq may'}.
What do noun-noun constructions have to do with whether these are
complete sentences? {nuH pegh} means "secret of the weapon" whether it's
in a complete sentence or not. *{qamchIyDaq 'uQ'a'} is wrong, according
to TKD, whether it's in a complete sentence or not.
--
SuStel
http://trimboli.name
More information about the Tlhingan-hol
mailing list