[Tlhingan-hol] KLBC : Sentences as objects

De'vID de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com
Fri Nov 20 03:03:19 PST 2015


De'vID:
>> There's these three sentences (which occur together):

SuStel:
> Then it goes BOTH ways.

All the canon examples of {ja'} with explicit objects seem to fall
into these categories:

1. speech event as direct object
{SengmeywIj vIja'laHbe'}

2. recipient (apparently) as direct object
{loDnI'Daj vavDaj je ja' qeylIS}

3. both: speech event as direct object, recipients as indirect object
{'ej chaHvaD lut ja'}

4. ???
{quv HIja'chuqQo'}

I think #2 is just a clipped version of #3, with the {-vaD} dropped.

It's #4 that I can't wrap my head around. Presumably, it's a version
of: {jIHvaD quv yIja'[chuq?]Qo'}.

I can see the prefix trick shortening that to {quv HIja'Qo'}, but then
I can't explain the {-chuq}.

We have:
{jIHvaD quv Daja'} "You tell me of honour"
{SoHvaD quv vIja'} "I tell you of honour"
{maja'chuq} "We discuss, confer" ("We tell each other")

And then maybe we can make...
*{HIja'chuq} "Let's discuss, confer" (???)
*{HIja'chuqQo'} "Let's not discuss, confer" (???)
*{quv maja'chuq} "We tell each other of honour" (???!!!)

And then, somehow, we end up with:
{quv HIja'chuqQo'} "Don't speak to me of honor." (i.e., "Don't
discuss/confer about honour with me.")

Or maybe it's simpler to explain it away as an error...

-- 
De'vID



More information about the Tlhingan-hol mailing list