[Tlhingan-hol] Concerning the purpose clauses

[Will Martin]

Thanks that helps. Also, I withdraw my “problem” with {vaj}, since it’s not a conjunction. The other clause is dependent. It’s just an adverbial.

I wish I had the time and/or wisdom to write with less noise and more signal.

pItlh
lojmIt tI'wI'nuv



> On Nov 9, 2015, at 3:20 PM, Alan Anderson <qunchuy at alcaco.net> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Will Martin <lojmitti7wi7nuv at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Okay, there’s a verb {yay’} that doesn’t seem appropriate here, so I’m not
>> suspecting a misspelling by omitting the glottal stop, and there’s a noun
>> {yay}, which can’t take a verb suffix {-meH}, so SOMEBODY either made a
>> mistake here, or there’s canon vocabulary I haven’t found yet.
> 
> Without access to my copy of the text, I'm only guessing, but I think
> the verb should be {yaj}.
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI'
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tlhingan-hol mailing list
> Tlhingan-hol at kli.org
> http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/attachments/20151109/d224bcb2/attachment.html>