[Tlhingan-hol] canonicity and transitivity

[Lieven]

Am 09.11.2015 um 18:51 schrieb De'vID:
> The Klingon part of the paq'batlh was written by Okrand and
> proof-read by KLI members, working from an English original text by
> Floris Schönfeld et al., I believe. It seems to be accepted as canon,
> though I think a few people are uncertain as to whether everything in
> it reflects correct usage. (Does that seem like a correct assessment?)

Yes, I think so. Due to that, I asked Marc Okrand during the qepHom 
while we talked about books in general, and he confirmed that he did do 
most of the translation work and that one could accept this as canon 
example of Klingon. He didn't just look at it. He wrote it.

-- 
Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
Grammarian of the KLI
http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher
http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/Paqbatlh