[Tlhingan-hol] Significance of constructed languages

[De'vID]

On 1 November 2015 at 14:35, qunnoQ HoD <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
> I know this must be terrible,but I have to start trying writing in Klingon..

yIHon'eghQo'.

> Holmey lumutlhlu' lo'laHghach
> Holmey lumutlhlu' lo'laHghach yajbe' vInDa'pu'.

DIp DachenmoH 'e' DaHechchugh, {-bogh} yIlIjQo'. {Holmey lumutlhlu'} =
"languages are constructed"; {Holmey lumutlhlu'bogh} = "languages
which are constructed".

> nItebHa' nuqem.

qechlIj vIyajchu' 'ach qechvam 'oSbe' mu'tlheghlIj.

{nItebHa' nuqem} = "together, they bring us", "they (acting together) bring us".

nuqDaq nuqem?

{nughomchoHmoH} qoj {nuyIrchoHmoH} 'e' DaHechba'.

> vInDa'pu' pIm. HatlhmeyDaq pIm. Hatlhmeyvo' pIm. nughmeyvo' pIm.

mu'tlheghmey naQ bIHbe'. Dach wot'a'.

> Hol ngIq chenmoHlu' jatlhlaH tera'nganpu'

{ngIq Hol chenmoHlu'bogh}.

> does this make any sense whatsoever ?

HIja'. majQa'. pab qellu'DI' loQ bIQagh 'ach qechmeylIj vIyajchu'.

-- 
De'vID