[Tlhingan-hol] naDev DoyIchlan Hol jatlh 'Iv?

[mayql qunenoS]

lojmIt tI'wI'nuv,mu'tlheghlIj wIja'chuqnIS.
lojmIt tI'wI'nuv your sentence we need to discuss.

mu'tlheghvam :
this sentence :

{nIb jIvtaHghach Quchchu’taHghach je}

DaH vIpoj..
now I will analyze it..

nIb (v) be identical

jIv (v) be ignorant
-taH (sufffix) continuous
-ghach nominalizer

Quch (v) be happy
-chu' clearly,perfectly
-taH (sufffix) continuous
-ghach nominalizer

je also,end (joining nouns)

mughlaw' mu'tlheghlIj :
your sentence apparently translates :

<ignorance and bliss are identical>

qaghel vIneH :
I want to ask you :

ghItlh TKD : ..verbs ending in suffixes such as -Ha' can take
-ghach,in order to form nouns..
TKD writes : ..verbs ending in suffixes such as -Ha' can take
-ghach,in order to form nouns..

'ej ghantoHmey nob : lo'laHghach value,naDHa'ghach
discommendation,naDqa'ghach re-commendation.
and gives the examples : lo'laHghach value,naDHa'ghach
discommendation,naDqa'ghach re-commendation.

'ach mojaqmey {-laH},{-Ha'},{-qa'} joq Dalo'be'. {-taH} Dalo'.
however you didn't use suffixes the {-laH},{-Ha'},{-qa'}. you used {-taH}.

vaj qaghel vIneH :
so I want to ask you :

latlh wot mojaqmey rarlaH {-ghach} ?
to what other additional suffixes is {-ghach} able to connect ?

qunnoQ

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:29 AM, De'vID <de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com> wrote:
> De'vID:
>>> DoyIchlan Hol jatlhlaHmo' 'op.
>
> QeS 'utlh:
>> lI'Ha'chu', De'vID. mISba'mo' qunnoQ, qech nIbqu' Dajatlhqa'chugh neH,
>> ghaytan DamISHa'moHlaHbe'.
>
> lI'law'. pab yaj qunnoQ 'e' vIHar. mu'tlhegh laDqa'chugh ghaytan yaj'eghmoHlaH.
>
> --
> De'vID
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tlhingan-hol mailing list
> Tlhingan-hol at kli.org
> http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol