[Tlhingan-hol] direct vs indirect relative clauses

[Robyn Stewart]

That's pretty much the canonical way to use -'e' with double-headed relative clauses. Credit goes to HoD Qanqor for originating it. 

> On Mar 29, 2014, at 19:10, Brad Wilson <bmacliam at aol.com> wrote:
> 
> Can I use the topic marker {-'e'} in the following manner?
> 
> 1) qama' mupbogh 'avwI''e' vIHoH = I killed the guard who struck the prisoner
> 2) qama''e' mupbogh 'avwI' vIHoH = I killed the prisoner whom the guard struck
> 
> I don't think the topic marker is required in #1, but I added it for clarity of comparison.
> 
> If so, then would the reverse also hold?
> 
> 3) mulegh qama' mupbogh 'avwI''e' = the guard who struck the prisoner sees me
> 4) mulegh qama''e' mupbogh 'avwI' = the prisoner whom the guard struck sees me
> 
> gheyIl
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tlhingan-hol mailing list
> Tlhingan-hol at kli.org
> http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/attachments/20140329/a9c45a70/attachment.html>