[Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}

[Rohan Fenwick]

ghItlhpu' Quvar, jatlh:
> I'm not sure if my previous message came through, but I like to point at 
> the examples in chapter 4.3 which use two Type Rover suffixes on one verb:
> 
> pIHoHvIpbe'qu'
> pIHoHvIpqu'be'
> pIHoHqu'vIpbe'

Ahhh, now I see what De'vID's confusion was (about the TKD general prohibition on multiple affixes of the same class, I guess).

Yes, as Quvar ably points out, multiple rovers on the same verb shouldn't be a problem. I see this as simply being because the rovers are only a "class" in the same way as the chuvmey are a "class", that is, they're defined only by their lack of membership in any other group.

QeS
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/attachments/20130706/3cd97969/attachment.html>