[Tlhingan-hol] po' (was: wa'maH cha' jatlhwI'pu' po'qu' chaH 'Iv'e'?)

[De'vID jonpIn]

De'vID:
>> So there's a TKD floating around out there somewhere with a
>> canonicalised error.

Philip Newton:
> Hm, is it really canonicalised?
>
> Perhaps it could be compared with the pronunciations of actors on
> takes that didn't make it into the final film: they exist but they
> don't (IMO) form canon; they are irrelevant.
>
> And an admitted error should not - again IMO - form canon, either.

A poor choice of wording on my part.  MO has made errors in canon,
which we all recognise as errors (like {Hagh} instead of {HaD} in
TKD).  By "canonicalised" I don't mean that it's good Klingon, only
that it's part of the "Okrandian canon", which certainly includes
errors.

-- 
De'vID