[Tlhingan-hol] qo''e' tu'bogh pagh - 'ay' cha'maH Hut

[Qov]

At 01:35 '?????' 3/8/2012, De'vID jonpIn wrote:
>(bIj maqta' tlhIngan bo'DIj.  rura' pente'Daq bIghHa''a' lughoS qama'pu'.)
>
>['entepray'-A meH]
>UHURA: rura' pente'!
>CHEKOV: qIb Dat {nov lom Daq} ponglu'.

I read {lom Daq} as morgue or mortuary. I suggest {mol Daq}.

>SCOTT: DaH muH rIntaH net maS.
>SPOCK: Sogh.  qIpbogh peng: cha'qa'.  taD!

Are they looking at a record tape or something? I don't understand 
Spock in English here. If so, the Klingon is clearer than the English.

>CHEKOV: 'entepray' 'oH.  mabaHpu'.
>SCOTT: DuHbe'!  ngIq peng wItoghtaHvIS wIlegh, qaH.
>SPOCK: jatlh qempa'wI': DuHlaHbe'bogh wIv DabuSHa'chugh, ghaytanHa'
>teH ratlhbogh wIv 'e' yIbuSHa'; teHbej.

I don't like the way buSHa' is used here, the "second person 
impersonal" is an English thing, I think, and DuH is a better 
translation than wIv. (Get rid of your English need to use 
contrasting root words.)  I'd prefer something in the direction of: 
{DuHlaHbe'bogh DuH qIllu'ta'DI' teHnIS tlhoS DuHlaHbe'bogh ratlhwI'}.

And there's a data point for your {loQ ... -bogh} earlier: the -bogh 
clause is its own clause with its own adjectives.

>UHURA: maHvaD yIQIj.
>SPOCK: chavetlh wIbaHlaHbe'chugh, baH latlh.
>SCOTT: toH, qIp'eghbe'.  latlh Duj tu'lu'be'.
>SPOCK: woj'a'na' tu'lu'bej.

woj law'qu'. It wasn't something beyond the ordinary sense of 
radiation: it was just a lot of it.

I get caught up finding plotholes and don't manage to critique the Klingon. :-)

- Qov