A footnote in the paq'batlh (pp. 70–1) claims that {petaQ} is derived
from {taQ} "be weird" with the plural imperative prefix {pe-}, and that
it means "something like 'weirdo.'"
Do we know whether Okrand had any input on grammatical footnotes that
are not derived from outside references? Is this derivation "canonical"?
--
SuStel
http://www.trimboli.name/