[Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh wa'maH Hut: <ghelbe' HoD>

[Robyn Stewart]

At 08:45 13/01/2012, you wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Qov <robyn at flyingstart.ca> wrote:
> > merchuqba' loD Hota'ro' je.
>
>be'vam qawlaw' Hoch'e'.

tlhIngan DujDaq loDpu' law' law' be'pu' law' puS. be'pu' lulIjbe'.

> > qaStaHvIS vagh lup tamtaH Hota'ro'. tagha' jatlh "vIQaylu'. nuqDaq ghaH
> > latlh'e'?" 'IQlaw' Hota'ro'.
>
>'ej 'Iv ghaH latlh'e'?

lIHbe'lu'pu'.

> > loDvaD jatlh vajar, "Daqotlhpu''a'?"
> > tlhuHlaHmeH loS loD ghIq jatlh, "ghobe'. Hegh vIqotlh. yIQorgh, qaH."
>
>Qorgh'eghlaHba' Hota'ro'.

'ach HoHbe'pu'.

> > yeptaHvIS QamchoH loD 'ej QIt mej.
>
>law' lutmey. 'Iq.

jItlhIj. tugh rarchuqchoH lutmey. lut'a'vam vIqonqa'chugh qeSlIj vIqelbej.

> > ...labbe'pu' HoD 'utlh.
>
>This makes me think that ghutar's uncle has done something called "not
>transmit". I'm not sure how much better {labpu'be'} is, but I believe
>that it is better enough.

You frequently have this issue with negation and aspects. It doesn't 
do anything to me at all. I will have to sit down with canon sometime 
and see if I can come to an understanding.

> > lutDaj vI'olmeH novvam De' peghbe'bogh HIlab. 'ej
> > tlhIngan Hol laHDaj yIchov.
>
>puS De'vam 'e' vIpIH, 'ach jImujrup.

puSbej.

> > 'ej qaghelnIS: nuq bop bom 'e' DaHar?
>
>bopbogh Soj 'anglu', loQ 'e' vIHaj.

bom DalIjbe'chugh jIQuch.

> > paw ghutar. tlhej vay'. batlh ghaHvaD jatlh ghutar, 'elpa'.
>
>reH ghutar laHHey vIbuSchoH. mIwDaj vItu'laHchugh, ghojwI'pu'
>vIpIlmoHmeH chaq ghaH vIDalaH.

Hoch vuv. quv buS. nuvpu' potlh tu' 'ej potlhmoH.

- Qov