[Tlhingan-hol] qo''e' tu'bogh pagh - 'ay' wa'maH wej

[Robyn Stewart]

At 15:27 24/02/2012, you wrote:

>De'vID:
> >> loQ *Emily Post* wIDabe'.  vutpa'vaD: pIq poH
>
>Qov:
> > piq gets abused here. I saw it used instead of tugh earlier and 
> here it should be qep vebvaD or something. pIq means [specified 
> time period] from now, not "fututure".
>
>jatlhpu' ghorqon, {qo''e' tu'bogh pagh}.  Delchu'meH chel, "the 
>future".  chay' qechvam vImughlaH?

jIbepDI' mu' qar vIchupniS'a'? :-)  "future" mughmeH pIq lo'lu'DI' 
vIqeH neH. {bov pIq} {bov veb} {nem} joq vImaS.

>De'vID:
> >> KIRK: nuqneH?
> >> SPOCK: pIH 'e' vItu'.
>
>Qov:
> > I find it expects it? Can't scroll well on this but tjis is too 
> literal for "i find it suspicious". vay' pIH vItu'pu'
>
>chaq {mupIHmoH} vIlo'.

qaq. vIparHa'.

>De'vID:
> >> [1] - Alas, no word for "neutron"; it's technobabble, but a 
> vital clue as any Trekkie knows that it signifies a cloaked ship.
>
>Qov:
> > Apparently I'm not trekkie enough. Is it too blatant to say 
> So'wI' rurbogh woj?
>
>HIja'.  woghlaw'.  So'pu'bogh Duj tu', wej 'e' pIH *Spock*.

Sov Hoch Hov leng ngotlhwI', 'ach Sovbe''a' Spock'e'?  Hujbej.