[Tlhingan-hol] Qagh vIHechbogh [was: Qaghmo' tIn mIS]

[De'vID jonpIn]

loghaD:
> Now, to the discussion I originally intended to set up: Do you agree that
my reasoning about «je» is - in principle, at least, if not in this
particular situation - correct?

wa' buv tera'ngan chab luleghDI' tlhInganpu', {Ha'DIbaH ghIH tIr ngogh je}
luper.

tera'Daq Do Qe' Such tlhIngan.  tebwI'vaD jatlh: {qa'vIn nIm je tIqem.
Ha'DIbaH ghIH tIr ngogh je tIqem je.}

loS Dochmey qem tebwI': wa' qa'vIn HIvje', wa' nIm HIvje', wa' 'ay' ghab
HaHlu'pu'bogh, wa' tIr ngoghHom je.

Do Qe'vam Such latlh tlhIngan.  tebwI'vaD jatlh: {qa'vIn nIm je yIqem.
Ha'DIbaH ghIH tIr ngogh je yIqem je.}

cha' Dochmey qem tebwI': wa' qa'vIn nIm je luDuDlu'pu'bogh ngaSbogh
HIvje''e', wa' Ha'DIbaH tIr ngogh je ngaSbogh tera'ngan chab'e' je.

Qaghbej lutlIj tera'ngan.  {HIja'} jatlhDI' tlhIngan, ghelnIS tera'gan:
{qa'vInlIjDaq nIm 'ar DaparHa'?}  Sovbejbe' ghaytan loyDI' muj.

--
De'vID
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/attachments/20120213/b1447344/attachment.html>