[Tlhingan-hol] Semantic roles with -moH... again

[David Trimboli]

On 2/9/2012 8:32 AM, Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh wrote:
>

> The {-moH} adds an object to otherwise objectless verbs, so I
> don't see why it shouldn't be fine to use {vI-} with {-'eghmoH}.

Using -'egh or -chuq requires the no-object prefix, as per TKD 4.2.1. 
Presumably this also means it requires that there be no object.

-- 
SuStel
http://www.trimboli.name/