[Tlhingan-hol] Semantic roles with -moH... again

[Rohan Fenwick - QeS 'utlh]

jatlhpu' quljIb, jatlh:
> {HIp vItuQmoH} - I dress (someone) in a uniform.
> {HIp vItuQeghmoH} - I dress myself in a uniform.

jang Qov, jatlh:
> If it's vItuQ'eghmoH, sure.

jIjang je jIH, jIjatlh:
> {vItuQ'eghmoH} DaghItlhHa'ba'pu'.

jang De'vID, jatlh:
> tay' {vI-}, {-'egh} je net chaw''a'?

The {-moH} adds an object to otherwise objectless verbs, so I
don't see why it shouldn't be fine to use {vI-} with {-'eghmoH}.
Though I can't find any canon examples of {-'eghmoH} with an
overt direct object or a corresponding prefix, the paq'batlh
does contain an example of {-chuqmoH} with an overt object:

Qo'noS tuqmey muvchuqmoH qeylIS
Kahless united the tribes of Kronos (paq'batlh p.179)

QeS 'utlh