[Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh javmaH chorgh: SuchwI'pu'

[Qov]

At 13:35 '?????' 4/24/2012, you wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Qov <robyn at flyingstart.ca> wrote:
> > Saqghom chutmey jatlhtaH 'ej wamwI'pu'vaD gheD mub perbogh navmey'e' nob
> > bu'. Hagh wa' SuvwI' 'e' Qoy vajar. jatlh, "Ha'DIbaH vIleghDI' vIHoH.
>
>o/`
>   muja' <chay' gheD law' DaHoHpu'?>
>   vaj vIjang, jIjatlh <'eH ramchu'.
>   pa' jIQam 'ej gheD vIghuH,
>   'ej vIHchoHDI' vay', vIchuH!>
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iATzgXyhYRs

majQa'!  bomvetlh vIQoypu'chugh vIqelbe' 'ach wamwI'vetlhvaD pup!

> > pay' ghutar pong jach ghogh. Qupbe'mo', ghutar vav ghaHlaH jatlhlI'bogh
> > loD'e'. jatlh "bIQol'a'? ghotlhej! mawam! Doj betleHlIj'!"
>
>'Iq <'> Qav.

So''egh 'e' nIDlaw' qaghwI'vetlh. I guess that's the other reason why 
I wish they had full letter status.  If only Marc had studied NW 
languages and was used to the 7 doing that job.

>gheD nach chev neHlaw'.

chaq! chaq Hugh luDuQ.

> > "nuq 'oH mI'lIj'e', HoD?" jatlh bu'. QI' mI'Daj ja' vajar. 
> tetlhDaj laD bu'.
> > jatlh, "ra'wI' tetlhDaq mI'lIj tu'lu'be'chugh bIQol net tuch. 'e' 
> ra' qImyal
> > Sa'."
>
>Do'Ha'. DujvamDaq Dat lunISlu'.

tlhIngan wo'Daq ngochmey, mIwmey je ghatlh 'e' vIwuqlaw'. meqwIj 
vISovbe'. chaq qejtaHlaw'mo' tlhInganpu' meqvam vIloy'. :-)

> > "qImyal Sa' beq maHbe'," jatlh vajar. "SuchwI'pu' maH. qImyal Sa' wISuchta'
> > 'ej DaH ghorDaq tej potlh wISuch. qama'pu' maHbe'." pIHlaw' bu'.
> >
> > jatlh Hota'ro', "bu', HoDwI' De' 'ollaH Qugh Qel." ropyaH rI' bu' 'ej
> > Dotlhchaj 'olta'DI' Qel ghogh, tetlhDaq pongmeychaj chel bu'.
>
>lut potlh ghaH Qel'e'.

nuv potlh? lut potlh ghaj 'ach ghaytan lut naQ vIja'be'.

> > chob'a'Daq ghutar luqIm nuv law'. lagh Qup luDech cha'maH SuvwI'pu'.
> > jatlhlI' ghutar. tonSaw', quv je poj. rurchuq 'ej rurbe'chuq. jatlhDI'
> > latlhpu' ghoHbe'. ghaqbej. quv luqeltaHvIS may'morgh lurur.
>
>I don't understand the use of {may'morgh} here. Doesn't it mean
>basically the gear (uniform, armor, weapons, etc.) someone would wear
>when going to battle?

Ah, didn't know that. I thought that was covered by {may'luch} and 
that {may'morgh} was more like a battle formation, warriors arrayed 
for battle: serious, ready to protect one another and act to advance 
together in response to opportunities.  Do we have canon, or are we 
just attributing different ideas to an unknown word?

> > quv luyajmeH
> > jIjchu' 'ej DevtaH HoS choHwI' tamlaHbe'bogh lagh'e'. laH Daj 'agh.
>
>laghvam lutHom vIqawbe'. ngajmo' DaHjaj poHwIj ('ej loQ jIbuDmo')
>vIlaDqa'be'lI'.

ghutar qIHDI' vajar, ghuv chu' ghaHpu'. qum qach 'avtaH. Dugh 'ej quv 
'ej Qu'Daj Dal quvmoHmo' muvmoH vajar. HoS choHwI' tam ghutar 'e' 
ra'DI' vajar, Dej Som 'ej luj tlham 'ej tlhoS Hegh ghutar 'ach Duj 
toy'chu'. ngugh SuvwI''a' ghaH 'e' tlhoj vajar.

vay' vIQIjqa' 'e' vItIv. reH yIghel.

> > jatlh ghogh, "wamwI' ghom veb!" ghoSchoH nIH loSwI'pu', ghutar 
> vantaHvIS 'ej
> > naDtaHvIS.
> >
> > "Qapla'!" jatlh ghutar.
>
>ngebbe'ba' vanvam.

<nuqneH>, <Qapla'> joq jatlhDI' lutwIj nuvpu', luHech.

Qatlh Qu'wIj. lut tIq 'ej Qatlh vIja' vIneHmo' 'ay'mey vIngeHnIS. 
'ach 'ay'mey mach vIngeHmo' lut wanI'mey vIjatlhnISqa'. 'ej lut 
tIqqu'moH jatlhqa'ghachvetlh.

toH, ngoQmeywIj vIchavlI':

wa') laHlIj vIDub/vIleH: ghaytan jIQaghtaH 'ej Dochmey vIghojpu'bogh 
vIlIjqa'taH 'ach vIta'be'chugh vIghojbe' 'ej latlh Dochmey vIlIjtaH.
cha') tlhIngan Hol laH vItob: pupbe' laHwIj 'ach tlhIngan Hol chav 
'aghtaH. vay' QublaH vay', DellaH tlhIngan Hol.
wej) latlhpu'vaD laDmeH 'eb vImuch: vImuchtaH 'ej lulaDbe'chugh pIch 
vIghajbe' jIH.

jabbI'IDghom chutmey vIpabbej 'ej Qu' vItIv je. lut lutIvchugh latlh 
nuvpu' vaj latlh chav 'oH.

- Qov