[Tlhingan-hol] paq'batlh: no' Hol

[De'vID jonpIn]

QeS 'utlh:
> I've deciphered the no' Hol from the prologue to the paq'batlh, and it
proves
> to be quite interesting. Am I OK to post about it now, or do people want a
> little more time to work it out for themselves?

jatlhpu' De'vID:

> > g'ubat, Dat pag' DyeDyot'qut!
>

jang Quvar, jatlh:

> > I head feared that someone might analyse this and then start to learn
> > no'Hol!
>

QeS 'utlh:
>
> Too late! {{;)
>

I guess it's okay to post your analysis now.  It's been a couple of days
already and people who are inclined to try to decipher the {no' Hol} have
probably already done so.

-- 
De'vID
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/attachments/20111129/344fde4b/attachment.html>