[Tlhingan-hol] Loose Klingon

Gaerfindel gaerfindel at hotmail.com
Sat Nov 26 21:14:39 PST 2011


nulI':
And here's where the difference between {chab chu} and {no' Hol} comes 
into play.

~quljIb
On 11/26/2011 11:11 PM, David Trimboli wrote:
> More and more, the new canon we see appears to break rules. I believe 
> that some of it is purely error, mostly the forgotten rules of no Type 
> 5s on the first noun of a noun-noun, net instead of 'e', and Type 7 on 
> the second verb of a sentence-as-object. However, there are some 
> "rules" that I am beginning to question...
>
> ..I'm not sure whether to take these as signs that Okrand can't keep 
> the whole thing in his head and makes LOTS of mistakes, or whether 
> Klingon is supposed to be more "yeah, whatever" than we give it credit 
> for. Remember the rigor their grammarians give to parts of speech...
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/attachments/20111127/783b323e/attachment.html>


More information about the Tlhingan-hol mailing list