[Tlhingan-hol] Loose Klingon
Gaerfindel
gaerfindel at hotmail.com
Sat Nov 26 21:14:39 PST 2011
nulI':
And here's where the difference between {chab chu} and {no' Hol} comes
into play.
~quljIb
On 11/26/2011 11:11 PM, David Trimboli wrote:
> More and more, the new canon we see appears to break rules. I believe
> that some of it is purely error, mostly the forgotten rules of no Type
> 5s on the first noun of a noun-noun, net instead of 'e', and Type 7 on
> the second verb of a sentence-as-object. However, there are some
> "rules" that I am beginning to question...
>
> ..I'm not sure whether to take these as signs that Okrand can't keep
> the whole thing in his head and makes LOTS of mistakes, or whether
> Klingon is supposed to be more "yeah, whatever" than we give it credit
> for. Remember the rigor their grammarians give to parts of speech...
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/attachments/20111127/783b323e/attachment.html>
More information about the Tlhingan-hol
mailing list