<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">nulI':<br>
And here's where the difference between {chab chu} and {no' Hol}
comes into play.</font><br>
<br>
~quljIb<br>
On 11/26/2011 11:11 PM, David Trimboli wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4ED1B867.2050006@trimboli.name" type="cite">More
and more, the new canon we see appears to break rules. I believe
that some of it is purely error, mostly the forgotten rules of no
Type 5s on the first noun of a noun-noun, net instead of 'e', and
Type 7 on the second verb of a sentence-as-object. However, there
are some "rules" that I am beginning to question...<br>
<br>
..I'm not sure whether to take these as signs that Okrand can't
keep the whole thing in his head and makes LOTS of mistakes, or
whether Klingon is supposed to be more "yeah, whatever" than we
give it credit for. Remember the rigor their grammarians give to
parts of speech...
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>