[Tlhingan-hol] grammatical constructions not in the main sources?

[mayql qunenoS]

De'vID:
> I don't see the expanded comparisons (HolQeD 13.1) here:
Lieven:
> DaH yIghaq!

De'vID, pa' De' chu' DachelDI', wIleghmeH ghojatlh.
De'vID, as soon as you add there new info, tell us so that we will see it.

mIv Hurgh qunnoq

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Lieven <levinius at gmx.de> wrote:
> Am 24.02.2016 um 18:36 schrieb De'vID:
>>
>> ... Do'Ha', jIghaq 'e' chawbe'.
>> [Access check on En.KlingonGrammarAddenda failed. Action "CHANGE":
>> access not allowed on topic.]
>
>
> The page was "protected" because I did not want tereS's work to be messed
> up. Butt I now see that this does not make sense if one likes to add new
> information, so I unlocked it now.
>
> DaH yIghaq!
>
> --
> Lieven L. Litaer
> aka Quvar valer 'utlh
> Grammarian of the KLI
> http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher
> http://www.klingonwiki.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tlhingan-hol mailing list
> Tlhingan-hol at kli.org
> http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol