[Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: meq

[mayql qunenoS]

ok jupwI' !

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:22 PM, David Holt <kenjutsuka at live.com> wrote:
> Or perhaps the best solution is to say something like, "boQwI' says its from HQ 13.1, p.8-10, Mar. 2004."
>
> Jeremy
>
> ________________________________________
> From: mayql qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 10:42 AM
> To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: meq
>
> ok, I understand now. I will always write the original canon source.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 5:53 PM, lojmIttI'wI'nuv
> <lojmitti7wi7nuv at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Just to clarify, the reason you want to give the original source is that
>> when you do that, some of us are inclined to check. If they discover that
>> the original source has been misquoted, those people will definitely let us
>> all know. Anyone else who is using the same indirect source will then know
>> to go in and make that correction.
>>
>> The simple truth is, there are thousands of words, lovingly managed by
>> dozens of people, and the odds are that every single one of those people has
>> made a mistake somewhere. TKD has mistakes in it. Anybody who thinks their
>> personal dictionary doesn’t have mistakes in it probably hasn’t found them
>> yet. It happens.
>>
>> So, we help each other out, finding and fixing our personal source material.
>>
>> pItlh
>> lojmIt tI'wI'nuv
>>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 23, 2016, at 10:20 AM, mayql qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> De'vID :
>>
>> Yes, but referencing a canon source preempts confusion over whether
>> something is canon. Also, other people can then look up the HolQeD
>> issue themselves, if they have access to it.
>>
>>
>> ok De'vID, from now on, I will always be making reference of the
>> original canon source.
>>
>> mIv Hurgh qunnoq
>> I love klingon women
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 2:48 PM, De'vID <de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> De'vID:
>>
>> Instead of citing {boQwI'}, I'd rather you cited the reference that it
>> links to, namely, HolQeD 13.1.
>>
>>
>> mayql qunenoS:
>>
>> If I wrote <HQ says..> , someone could say <how do you know since you
>> don't have it ?> , so I would have again to say <because boQwI' says
>> that HQ says..>.
>>
>>
>> Yes, but referencing a canon source preempts confusion over whether
>> something is canon. Also, other people can then look up the HolQeD
>> issue themselves, if they have access to it.
>>
>> --
>> De'vID
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tlhingan-hol mailing list
>> Tlhingan-hol at kli.org
>> http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tlhingan-hol mailing list
>> Tlhingan-hol at kli.org
>> http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tlhingan-hol mailing list
>> Tlhingan-hol at kli.org
>> http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tlhingan-hol mailing list
> Tlhingan-hol at kli.org
> http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tlhingan-hol mailing list
> Tlhingan-hol at kli.org
> http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol