[Tlhingan-hol] Hellraiser Bloodline

[mayqel qunenoS]

lieven:
> I always enjoy translating silly things to find out how far we can go, and I am
> sure nobody knows what I'm talking about when I mention {ghe'tor pepwI' 'Iw tlhegh}

HIja'.. *hellraiser bloodline* Hoch mu' wImugh wIneHchugh, vaj lugh
{ghe'tor pepwI' 'Iw tlhegh} ; 'a *hellraiser bloodline* wIDelchu'
wIneHchugh vaj maghel'egh :

nuq Del *hellraiser bloodline* ? ghe''or rItbogh vay''e' Del
*hellraiser*. puq poH Del *bloodline*. toH *hellraiser bloodline* Del
ghe''or rItwI' puq poH 'e' vIHar.

DaHjaj ram, Do'Ha' ghIjmeH mIllogh vInajqa'law'..

qunnoq HoD

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:00 PM, SuStel <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:
> On 4/18/2016 7:48 AM, Lieven wrote:
>>
>> Am 18.04.2016 um 13:27 schrieb De'vID:
>>>
>>> On 18 April 2016 at 11:50, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> a' ghIjmeH much puS lutu'lu' vIparHa'bogh.
>>>
>>>
>>> {tu'lu'} is a set form. It's used even when referring to a plural object.
>>
>>
>> True, although {lutu'lu'} is not incorrect, it's just "a bit too
>> pedantic".
>
>
> The relative clause is in the wrong position.
>
> ghIjmeH much puS vIparHa'bogh tu'lu'.
>
> Simpler, however, to say:
>
> ghIjmeH much puS vIparHa'.
>
> --
> SuStel
> http://trimboli.name
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tlhingan-hol mailing list
> Tlhingan-hol at kli.org
> http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol