[Tlhingan-hol] {-vaD}

[De'vID]

bI'reng:
>> 12. QeD vIghojmoH.
>> [...]
>> But if one of those arguments is unstated, perhaps we can apply either
>> pattern (iv), as in sentence 11, or pattern (v), as in sentence 12,
>> with the implied {-vaD} argument left unspoken.

lojmIt tI'wI' nuv:
> I follow you right up to the very end. You mention an implied {-vaD}. Does
> that suggest that an explicit {-vaD} would also be correct? If not, why not?

He's not saying that the {-vaD} is implied (i.e., on {QeD}). He's
saying that the argument with {-vaD} (i.e., {puqvaD}) is implied.

-- 
De'vID