[Tlhingan-hol] Significance of constructed languages

[qunnoQ HoD]

> Get away from the noun centric English, and think in Klingon, using
"action".

you mean that there is a suffix/prefix indicating <<to act>> ?

>  If you find yourself wanting to use -ghach on a bare verb, consider
reforming the sentence so that
the verb stays a verb.

great idea. I just added this to my tlhIngan Hol pearls list.

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:09 AM, DloraH <seruq at bellsouth.net> wrote:

> > > Technically, you COULD use {-ghach} on a bare verb, but
> > > you'd really only do it as a joke or some other intentionally
> > > ungrammatical construction, to call attention to the word in
> > > some oddly special way. Nobody does it in normal
> > > conversation. It ain't no citified way to speak proper Klingon.
> >
> >
> > ok, I understand. thank you.
>
> If you find yourself wanting to use -ghach on a bare verb, consider
> reforming the sentence so that
> the verb stays a verb.  Get away from the noun centric English, and think
> in Klingon, using
> "action".
>
>
> -- DloraH
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tlhingan-hol mailing list
> Tlhingan-hol at kli.org
> http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/attachments/20151103/70280f30/attachment.html>