[Tlhingan-hol] nga'chuq

[Felix Malmenbeck]

I think you're right about tay', but not tlhej. With tlhej, the subject accompanies the object. It's described in some detail in HolQeD 2:4:
http://klingonska.org/canon/1993-12-holqed-02-4.txt

Perhaps you are confusing it with ghom, which has been shown to work both ways?

tachDaq maghom. [TKD]
wo' San luwuqmeH pa' ghom tlhIngan yejquv DevwI'pu'. [SkyBox 25]

rut yIHmey ghom Hoch. [TKW]
bInajtaHvIS, qeylIS Daghomjaj. [PK]
tlhIngan 'avwI' lughom. [PK]


5 jan 2015 kl. 21:11 skrev Fiat Knox <fiat_knox at yahoo.co.uk<mailto:fiat_knox at yahoo.co.uk>>:

So if Maltz confirmed that all the involved parties in a sentence with nga'chuq are in the subject, then that makes nga'chuq of a similar type to tlhej:

wa'Hu' ram nga'chuqta' 'oSwI' loDnalDaj je

should have the same structure as

reH tlhej SuvwI'vetlh Seng je

and

reH tay' ghot tuqDaj je

if I read that aright.
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol at kli.org<mailto:Tlhingan-hol at kli.org>
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/attachments/20150105/3dc1bced/attachment.html>