[Tlhingan-hol] KLBC : Sentences as objects

[mayql qunenoS]

ok,I understand now. thank you all.

qunnoQ

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 6:36 PM, SuStel <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:
> On 12/17/2015 11:24 AM, Alan Anderson wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:13 AM, mayql qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> luyu'nIS 'e' lulIj} <they forgot that they needed to question him>
>>> {choQaHmeH bIqet} <in order to help me you run>
>>
>>
>> majQa'! pup mu'tlheghmeyvam.
>>
>> Depending on the exact situation being described, the first one
>> *might* be improved with the suffix {-pu'} on the first verb.
>
>
> In most examples I can think of, {-pu'} would not be desired. You're
> describing a need for interrogation, not a need for completed interrogation.
> ghunchu'wI' is probably thinking of "completed needing," but I don't see
> that in the English. There was no interrogation, so there was no completion.
> The fact that it's in the past would be indicated by other context.
>
> --
> SuStel
> http://trimboli.name
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tlhingan-hol mailing list
> Tlhingan-hol at kli.org
> http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol