[Tlhingan-hol] Vows

[Elizabeth Lawrence]

De'vID, I really do like the sentiment of [baj] much better than [vum],
thanks for the suggestion.

ghunchu'wI', what is the difference in sense between [ghob] and [Suv] that
makes you prefer it?

What about this draft?

DaHjaj  qanay/DaHjaj  qaSaw
reH  qatlhej  ‘e’  vI’Ip
reH  SoHvaD  jISuv  ‘e’  vI’Ip
reH   juHlIj  ‘oH  juHwIj’e’ ‘e’  vI’Ip (so far so good)
maHaghruptaHjaj
maQaHchuqjaj  (I think the sentiments are clearer in this form, but I'm not
sure -jaj has enough of the feeling of a vow, it feels more like a toast to
me.)
jIyIntaHvIS  bangwI’  SoHtaH
DaHjaj qorDu' chu' wIchenmoH

qatlho'
be''etlh

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Robyn Stewart <robyn at flyingstart.ca> wrote:

> I thought about that as I typed it. It was on a phone, so a little awkward
> to edit. I was pretty sure those who needed to know would know what was
> meant.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: De'vID [mailto:de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com]
> Sent: May 28, 2014 9:47
> To: Robyn Stewart
> Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Vows
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Robyn Stewart <robyn at flyingstart.ca>
> wrote:
> > And if it's going to be plural (speaking in unison?), 'e' wI'Ip, not 'e'
> ma'Ip.
>
> You really need to bracket your Klingon so it's clear when you mean "not"
> and when you mean {not}.
>
> --
> De'vID
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tlhingan-hol mailing list
> Tlhingan-hol at kli.org
> http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/attachments/20140602/a6b80af8/attachment.html>