[Tlhingan-hol] 'arDIch

Tim Stoffel tim at lionlamb.us
Sat Jan 26 22:45:52 PST 2013


So the stories are true. There really are 'grammar police' in some parts
of the world!

;)
Tim Stoffel

--

On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 19:00 -0800, Robyn Stewart wrote:
> Unlike many languages, English doesn't have a 
> governing body that declares words or structures 
> official or not, so there is no particular thing 
> "alright" has to do to make it to the big time. 
> It is generally considered a misspelling of "all 
> right" so I suppose if it were to develop a 
> distinct meaning in the manner of "all ready" 
> versus "already" it would soon be considered standard English.
> 
> And maybe one day nISwI' bej will denote a 
> particular kind of nISwI' not adequately covered 
> by nISwI' beH, perhaps puS'eghlaH nIHwI' bej.
> 
> - Qov
> 
> At 18:40 '?????' 1/26/2013, you wrote:
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64'Alright' has 
> >documented written use for 400 years and appears 
> >in many dictionaries.  What does a word have to do to become official?
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >
> >From: Robyn Stewart
> >Sent: 26 Jan 2013 22:54:55 GMT
> >To: tlhingan-hol at kli.org
> >Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] 'arDIch
> >
> >The issue is that "alright" is not considered a real word in standard English.
> >
> >At 02:14 '??ÏÉÈK̍‹ÌŒLË[ÝHÜ›ÝN‚‚à>> «'arDIch» 
> >seems like an alright construction to me.
> > > ˆ\ÈÙ[[˜ÙH[]\Ù\ÈYHÜ™X]K‚ˆà €ø meq vIyajbe'. HIchuH!
> >ˆ]Z›[ÉÈ]’IÈÛ™^IÙYÚ]IÝYÚ‚‚€>qar'a'? mumee ngoDvam! chay' jIQaghpu'?
> >—××××××××××××À___________________________
> > >From: Robyn Stewart [robyn at flyingstart.ca]
> > >Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 23:58
> >΀ tlhIngan-Hol
> >ÝXš™X݈™NˆÕ[™Ø[‹ZÛH     Ø\‘Xڏ‚„öâ2013-01-25, at 
> >13:10, Felix Malmenbeck <felixm at kth.se܀ote:
> >ˆˆ]ÛÝ[[ÝHØ^H Ø\‘XÚ’R÷"¤”‚v$D­6€?
> >‚ˆ&÷F‚öbF†÷6Rv÷VÆBv—fRÖRW6Râ2×RvÖW£âru', I 
> >suppose either could work, but I'd
> > > probably just pay for the extra syllable and
> >\ÚÈÛ]Z™^]IÈ     Ø\ßKˆ
> >Àpatlh 'arDIch?} might
> > > also get the message across; supposedly, it'd
> > > be a trunctated form of somethng like {patlh 'arDIch vIchavpu'KŠBˆ‚‚àøƒ
> >¬
É%£
> >ìÍ••µÌ±¥­” an alright construction to me.
> >‚F†—26VçFVæ6R×W6W0 me greatly.
> > > >
> >ˆY\H’^XZ˜™IˈXÚRB‚›]Z›[ÉÈ]’@' Hol, jey'egh mu'tlhegh.
> >ˆ‚‚âõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõõð___________________
> >ˆœ›ÛNˆ›Øž[ˆÝ]Ø\Ü›Øž[›Z[™Àstart.ca]
> > > > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 21:55
> > > À: tlhIngan-Hol
> > > ÝXš™X݈™NˆÕ[™Ø[‹ZÛH   Ø\‘Xڏˆ>
> >ˆ\ÈH]IȝIÈ[ˆ[™Û\ڝHÝË[X[ž]È‚ˆÛÝ[be understood, but different
> >Û۝^\Ù[œÚ]]™HÛÛ][Û€s need to be found.
> >‚ˆRærâ¶&6Rf­æ—6
Ò%v†Bw2my 
> >place‚‚à£â  ÕЁݽձå½ÔÍ
䀝
É% ©% ü½È©% €'arDIch?
> > > ˆ‚‚à£â(ø€ø=¸€ÈÌ´´ÈÔ°
ЀÜèÐ䰁1¥•Øen <levinius at gmx.de> wrote:
> > > >
> >€£âãâF†—2—2­çFW&W0ting - from an english point
> >ÙˆšY]È]ÛÝ[™Èݘ[™ÙHto say "the
> > > how-many-est", but in German, it's completely 
> > normal to say "der wievielte".
> > > >>
> > > ˆHÛÝ[XØÙ\t {'arDIch} just like
> > > {'arlogh}. {'arDIch} sounds logic and will be
> > > understood. As long as Maltz doesn't say no, why should we?
> > > ‚‚4´(ø€øø1¥•Ù•¸0¸1¥Ñ
•È( > aka Quvar valer 'utlh
> >‚‡GG¢ò÷wwræf6V&öö²æ6öÒô¶Æ­æponteacher
> > > >>
> > > ‚‚}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}|_______________
> > > >> Tlhingan-hol mailing list
> >‚FƆ­àgan-hol at stodi.digitalkingdom.org
> > > ˆ‹˜ÝÙK™YÚ]@lkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
> > > >
> >ˆ×××××À_________________________________________
> > > [™Ø[‹ZÀl mailing list
> > > [™Ø[‹ZÛÝÙK™YÚ][Ú[™ÙÛK›Ü™Â€> ‹˜ÝÙK™YÚ][Ú[™ÙÛK›Ü™ËÛXZ[X[‹Û\Ý[™›ËÝ@ngan-hol
> > >
> >××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××À__
> > >Tlhingan-hol mailing list
> > >Tlhingan-hol at stodi.digitalkingdom.org
> > >http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Tlhingan-hol mailing list
> >Tlhingan-hol at stodi.digitalkingdom.org
> >http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Tlhingan-hol mailing list
> >Tlhingan-hol at stodi.digitalkingdom.org
> >http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tlhingan-hol mailing list
> Tlhingan-hol at stodi.digitalkingdom.org
> http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol




More information about the Tlhingan-hol mailing list