[Tlhingan-hol] Canon?

[De'vID]

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Fiat Knox <fiat_knox at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> For a time, I found myself asking whether there was a Klingon term for
> "canon."
>
> Then I thought: use {mub} legal, be legal (v) for canon and {Hat} illegal,
> be illegal (v) for non-canon.
>
> Does that work for anyone else?

Canon has to do with more than just legality though: it has to do with
the existence of a {chovnatlh'a'}.

-- 
De'vID