[Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: luj

[jaSwa']

I thought it was clipped. I guess it never registered to me that it may have been a mistake since it actually used a pronoun.

jaSwa'

Hochlogh bechjaj Hoch jaghpu'wI'

Felix Malmenbeck <felixm at kth.se> wrote:

>> What about this is an error? I guess I don't see it.
>
>It's lacking a pronomial prefix:
>
>lujpu' jIH -> jIlujpu' jIH
>
>lujpu' jIH'e' -> jIlujpu' jIH'e'
>
>________________________________________
>From: jaSwa' [DarksideTheMidnightShadow at yahoo.com]
>Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 20:09
>To: David Trimboli; tlhingan-hol at stodi.digitalkingdom.org
>Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: luj
>
>What about this is an error? I guess I don't see it.
>
>jaSwa'
>
>Hochlogh bechjaj Hoch jaghpu'wI'
>
>David Trimboli <david at trimboli.name> wrote:
>
>>On 9/27/2012 4:50 AM, Klingonteacher wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 27.09.2012 02:35, schrieb David Holt:
>>>>  > lujpu' jIH'e'
>>>>  > I, and only I, have failed. TKD
>>>>
>>>> Are these simply errors?  Is there some grammar rule that I've
>>>> forgotten?  Is this some sort of set phrase?
>>>
>>> This is interesting indeed.
>>
>>Heh. This gets rediscovered about every other year.
>>
>>It's an error.
>>
>>--
>>SuStel
>>http://www.trimboli.name/
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Tlhingan-hol mailing list
>>Tlhingan-hol at stodi.digitalkingdom.org
>>http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
>_______________________________________________
>Tlhingan-hol mailing list
>Tlhingan-hol at stodi.digitalkingdom.org
>http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol