[Tlhingan-hol] 'e'mo'

ghunchu'wI' qunchuy at alcaco.net
Sun May 20 15:19:48 PDT 2012


On May 20, 2012, at 10:24 AM, "De'vID jonpIn" <de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com> wrote:

> ghunchu'wI':
>> Why not just put the suffix on the verb and not use {'e'} at all?
> 
> If I was writing and could revise my sentence, that's what I would do.
> This came up because I wanted to say something, and I'd already said
> the first sentence, paused, and then I realised I wanted to add {-mo'}
> to the first verb and continue with a second part.  I wondered if I
> could've salvaged the situation by continuing {'e'mo'...}

Same question: why not put {-mo'} on the verb? If, for example, you had said {paqwIj tlhappu' jIlwI'}, you could then finish the thought with {tlhapmo' vIlaDlaHbe'} instead of a pseudogrammatical {'e'mo'}.

-- ghunchu'wI'


More information about the Tlhingan-hol mailing list