[Tlhingan-hol] 'e'mo'

[De'vID jonpIn]

QeS 'utlh:
> "They ['e' and net] are always treated as the object of the verb, and the
> verb always takes a prefix indicating a third-person singular object."

Ah, that settles it.

QeS 'utlh:
> So since {'e'} and {net} require verbal agreement, that basically ties
> them to the direct object position. So no, I doubt that {'e'} can take
> suffixes. Was there a particular reason you were wondering?

Because when I'm speaking, I sometimes finish saying something before I
realise I wanted to make it the first part of a longer sentence, and I
don't want to start over.

--
De'vID
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol/attachments/20120520/79aff5a0/attachment.html>