[Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh cha'maH Hut: <no' chavmey>

[Felix Malmenbeck]

Actually, Qov, you just go ahead and ja' that lut.

paq'batlh, paq'raD, Canto 7, Stanza 8:

Kahless also went out to search
For allies across Kronos,
And told themhis tale

Qo'noSDaq boqwI'mey
nejmeH je leng qeylIS
'ej chaHvaD lut ja'

(Canto 7 uses ja' with listeners as the apparent objects, so it may indeed be an instance of the prefix trick, which I believe we've seen begore with other verbs of speaking)
________________________________________
From: Robyn Stewart [robyn at flyingstart.ca]
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 17:42
To: David Trimboli; tlhingan-hol at stodi.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh cha'maH Hut: <no' chavmey>

I wish to ja' a lut, but I caved today to the pressure of canon and
reluctantly vIjatlhta'.

At 08:28 26/01/2012, David Trimboli wrote:
>On 1/26/2012 10:33 AM, Lieven Litaer wrote:
>>
>>Am 24.01.2012 21:57, schrieb David Trimboli:
>>>On the other hand, I am convinced that {Dotlh yIja'} is perfectly valid
>>>for "report status!"
>>
>>Oh, wejpuH: you are "convinced"?
>>You are now contradicting yourself. ;-)
>
>How so?
>
>>If I cannot {ja'} a {lut}, then you cannot {ja'} the {Dotlh}!
>
>I didn't say you can't {ja'} a {lut}. I think you can.
>
>--
>SuStel
>http://www.trimboli.name/
>
>_______________________________________________
>Tlhingan-hol mailing list
>Tlhingan-hol at stodi.digitalkingdom.org
>http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol


_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol at stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol