[Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' wa'vatlh cha'maH wa': <jeymey>

[ghunchu'wI' 'utlh]

On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Qov <robyn at flyingstart.ca> wrote:
> qaD 'oHbe'pu' 'e' Sovchu' ghutar.
> batlh vangmeH HoD tojta' ghutar.[85]

jaS ghu' vIyajnISchoH.

> *Dugh* muvDI'
> ghutar, QIpmo' ghu'mey yajbe' 'e' Har vajar. 'ach 'ong DaH 'e' tlhoj.

jaS ghaH vIchovpu'. QIpbe'. Qup 'ej jIv neH 'e' vIQub.

> jatlh “jonwI' choQ Danaw'ta''a', HoD? Hung yaHDaq jeylIj vIleghpu' 'ej not
> 'el SuchwI' chaw'lIj. pa' DapawDI' Da'el net tuch.”

chaw' Hevpa' HoD qaS qar'a'?

> jatlh ghutar, “*Dugh* HungpIn jIHmo' Hung pat chu' vIleghDI' vInuD vIneH.
> patrajmo' Hem 'avwI'pu' tlhIbHa'."

patchajmo' Hem, qar'a'?

> "muQIj. HoDwI' vIQannISmo' ghochmeylIj vIlegh net tuchbe'.”
>
> jatlh Hota'ro', “pa' bISaH 'e' yIpegh. pa' ghoS SuchwI' net tuch.” toH,
> vIt'a'? toj'a'? ghuHmoHpu'mo' qImyal yep vajar.

tachDaq qaH'eng ghomchugh, ghaytan 'ollaH.

> “qatlh maQaynIS?” jatlh ghutar.

tum'a' chut 'oH. Similar to the one forbidding an aspect suffix on a
verb with {'e'} as its object, perhaps.

-- ghunchu'wI'