[Tlhingan-hol] Qaghmo' tIn mIS

[Qov]

At 13:15 12/02/2012, you wrote:
> >> 7. vIghro' mIllogh cha'bogh HIvje''e' neHpu' tlhIngan. lol 
> vIghro': >> 
> http://sprocketink.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/hover-cat.jpg > 
> Dun!  vIghro'vetlh cha'bogh HIvje' vIneH je. ('ach chonobbe'chugh 
> qaHoHbe'). jIHaghtaHvIS nuchwIj nargh SIp.

nujwIj. At least I'm not the only one making weird typing errors here.

> >mu'meylIj vIbuS: <teHbe' lut. vaj yajHa'chu' pagh. jaS yaj 
> neH.> > >chay' jaS yajlaH vay' 'e' vISIv. mu'tlheghvetlh vIyaj 'ach 
> pabbe'. >ghelmeH mu'tlhegh [Huj] 'oH <<ghelmeH mu'tlhegh> 'e' 
> vISIv>'e'. >maqmeH mu'tlhegh 'oHbe'. "When I wonder if one can 
> understand it >differently, what manner of being able to understand 
> differently am >I considering." > Ah I thought we had canon with 
> SIv on those. question 'e' vISIv = "I > wonder question", but if we 
> don't, I'm wrong. ghantoH tu'lu' 'e' vIHarbe' 'ach chaq jIlughbe'. 
> http://klingonska.org/canon/search/?file=1997-07-01-news.txt&get=source 
> http://klingonska.org/canon/search/?file=1998-12-holqed-07-4.txt&get=source

Nah, I'm just wrong then. I dunno why I thought we had that.  I 
should learn Klingon. That was the point of writing my story, but I 
don't know if I've improved any. Maybe I should be penalized in some 
way for every error I make.

>As far as I know, we got our first confirmation of QAO on the 
>EuroTalk DVD with <nuq Datlhutlh DaneH?>. Here, the two-sentence 
>construction remains a question. > ? chay' jaS yajlaH vay' - how can 
>someone understand it differently, > I wonder that. <'e' vISIv> 
>DaghItlhnIS'a'? bIghelchugh bISIvba'.

qechvetlh vItIv.

>  jIlugh'eghmoH: ghelDI' tlhIngan SIvba'. ghelDI' tera'ngan chaq 
> SIvbe'. Huj tera'nganpu'. pIj mughel tera'nganpu', jatlh, "How are 
> you?" 'ej ghIq jIjangtaHvIS munIS! qatlh ghel SIvbe'chugh 
> jay'!? > > pegh vISamta'bogh muyonbe'pu'. <muyonmoHbe'pu' pegh 
> vISamta'bogh> > DaghItlhpu' 'e' DaHech'a'? > I think I changed the 
> sentence I was writing in the middle, from pegh > vISamta'chugh 
> muyonbe' to whatever I ended up writing. I read <pegh vISamta'chugh 
> muyonbe'> as "If I have found the secret, it's not satisfied with me." ;)

not peghmeywIj vIyonmoHlaH. peghmey QIp vImuS. :-)

- Qov