[Tlhingan-hol] Semantic roles with -moH... again

[De'vID jonpIn]

QeS 'utlh:
>> The {-moH} adds an object to otherwise objectless verbs, so I
>> don't see why it shouldn't be fine to use {vI-} with {-'eghmoH}.

SuStel:
> Using -'egh or -chuq requires the no-object prefix, as per TKD 4.2.1. Presumably this also means it requires that there be no object.

'e' vIQubpu'.

'ach chay' {Qo'noS tuqmey muvchuqmoH qeylIS} DaQIj?

QeS 'utlh:
> Qo'noS tuqmey muvchuqmoH qeylIS
> Kahless united the tribes of Kronos (paq'batlh p.179)

qaStaH nuq jay'?

chay' mu'tlheghvam chenlu'?

{muv Qo'noS tuqmey} - the tribes of Kronos join (something)
{Qo'noS tuqmey muv Qo'noS tuqmey} - the tribes of Kronos join the
tribes of Kronos
{muvchuq Qo'noS tuqmey} - the tribes of Kronos unite (join each other)
{Qo'noS tuqmey muvmoH qeylIS} - Kahless causes the tribes of Kronos to
join (something)
{Qo'noS tuqmeyvaD Qo'noS tuqmey muvmoH qeylIS} - Kahless causes the
tribes of Kronos to join the tribes of Kronos
{Qo'noS tuqmey muvchuqmoH qeylIS} - Kahless causes the tribes of
Kronos to join each other (???)

mu'tlheghvam vIyajbej 'ach pabDaj vIQIjlaHbe'.

--
De'vID