[Tlhingan-hol] To-Be-Constructions

[David Trimboli]

On 4/3/2012 10:59 AM, De'vID jonpIn wrote:
>
> De'vID:
>  >> This is unambiguously the canonical grammar
>
> SuStel:
>  > mu'vetlh lo'taHchugh Hoch, vay' vIHoHbej jay'...
>
> mu'vam vIlo'be'choH 'e' vInID!

jIbeppu'DI' loQ jIqIDpu' neH. loQ.

Your lack of time context in that sentence confuses me. Do you mean you 
have previously tried to stop using the word, or that you plan to stop 
using it in the future? Or both?

> toH.  lugh pabvam, qar'a'?

lughba'. not vIHon.

-- 
SuStel
http://www.trimboli.name/