[Tlhingan-hol] nuq bop bom: 'ay' chorghmaH Soch: <taj noj>

[ghunchu'wI' 'utlh]

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Qov <robyn at flyingstart.ca> wrote:
> jatlhtaH 'ungya 'e' QoylaHmo' leSchoH...

vIHarbe'DI' jIlugh. maj.

> qIv pup. DaSpu' lo'be' 'ach 'oy' SIQ 'e'
> 'angmo' Hota'ro' qab bel HoD. meHDaq chegh.

'oy'vammo' nuq ghoj Hota'ro'?

> jatlh 'ungya, "SochHu' , poSchoHpa' Som, lopmeH neH Hu'qa'ta'mo' DeghwI',
> nuHmey qengbe'pu'. pa'DajDaq Hoch nuHDaj tu'lu'."

toH. nuHDaj Suqqa' qen 'e' bot HoD. paDaj 'elrupDI' Hota'ro' Sut neH
vIqelpu'. tlhIngan jIHbe'ba'.

> jatlh Hota'ro', "jItoy'rup, HoD. chay' chora'?"
> "puchpa' yISay'moH. yIruch!" jatlh.

puchpa' lIw'e' Say'nISmoHba'.

> jatlh HoD. "qatlh ghaH DarI'pu'?"
> "chojangbe'mo'," jatlh 'ungya.

napqu'.

> "mughIj. may wanI' 'e' SaHbe'law'mo' ghob Hutlhlaw'. Huj." jatlh HoD.

SuvwI' neH ghaHbe' 'op tlhIngan'e' net SovnIS.

> "Hut tlhIngan may'Duj HoDpu' DaponglaH'a'?"[52]
> [52] Can pong mean "specify the existing name of" in this way? I haven't
> used it this way before.

I don't know for certain that {pong} is correct here, but it doesn't
bother me.  However, I'm pretty sure {per} works.

> "ngIq wa' may'Duj HoD vIponglaHbe'." jatlh HoD "vISaHbe'chu'."

<ngIq wa' may'Duj HoD> vIyajchu'be'.  chay' qech SIgh <ngIq>?
Dachchugh pImbe'law' mu'tlhegh.

-- ghunchu'wI'